Why have aims to upgrade your gear in any way, much better to cheap RS gold just stop progressing. Absolutely fucking dumb justification for our ever-increasing death expenses. And no this is not saying we should not have any death cost, like Five-O said, it ought to only be capped as the OSRS one will be. It's not even an option unless you only ring change constantly, in which case you are sitting in a 50/50 of having to cover an insane uncapped death cost. They can not release a new ring with a passive. Rod substituted asr for ALL uses when death costs creeped their own way to the 3-5m for typical single style setups. It's simply not realistic unless you're fuckin Couchy or some thing.
Common sense is hard apparently. It's the exact same mentality you employ to the wilderness as well as other dangerous areas. Also you're completely missing the context. OSRS currently has 0-cost deaths, out of handful of places which you cover 50-100k no matter what you had on you when you died. Possessing a climbing price is more punishing, but it's the same method in RS3. You did not see Day1 Solak teams bringing full hybrid swaps and devoting up to 10m. You watched most people focusing on a single fashion, with RoD, etc.. That's how learning is assumed to be. Once you're more comfortable, you fall food/supplies for more harm, swaps, etc.. Which is the cycle the statement suggests. Try learning first instead of trying to perform top-efficiency kills.
To be honest, comparing to the wilderness is a bad argument because a whole lot of players that are rs3 think its dumb and must be taken away as well. When studying efficacy approaches are more than you make with no drops within an group in an hour If the passing cost? Cause you can readily die many times to studying solak that is hybrid. I would argue that by the time you've expired 10 times with a 10-13m death fee you no longer stand to make more by hybriding another 100 hours. Great to know of common sense nevertheless exist. Imagine using vigour as an example instead of asylum or lotd or actual irngs. But no, swapping for 1 tick of a risk, and thus don't do it. Return to starting your lootboxes rather than commenting, since it is obviously too hard.
The continued development via the accession of minigames and new themed zones from 2004-2008 continued to add the"optional complexity" that added depth without requiring it. You could spend your time exploring the entire world... or simply hang out in edgeville selling products and buying herbs into the PKers and others. I'm eager to see where TR goes, since it appears to be following a very similar path just with a few upgraded combat mechanics (that do not require 4 toolbars full of skills and strikes ).
RS3: p2w so everyone quit and that I loved RS2 a whole lot more than today, and I really do osrs. Evolution of combat (basically wow type of skill and global based battle ) update ruined RuneScape for many not simply because they enjoyed simplistic battle but also because that eoc was terrible. So unresponsive and also unbalanced. Another aspect that is terrible is that RuneScape just runs with tick cycle for battle even in osrs. It only adds that unresponsive feeling.I have no clue why are you so upvoted since your comment is very bad with its argument. I'm not positive if you played with any of those games just made something up which type of buy old school runescape gold next sense for the masses. It's not your fault tho which you get highlighted.
